Steep Learning Curve

A line graph where the vertical axis is marked from 0% to 100% Proficiency, and the horizontal axis is marked from 0 Hours to 200 Hours. A green line starts at 0/0, at about 30 hours, it has risen to almost 20% proficiency. By 50 hours it has risen sharply to around 50% proficiency. By 60 hours, 85% proficiency. Then the line starts to level off gradually, reaching 100% around 110 hours. A red line starts at 0/0. By 60 hours only 10% proficiency. It gradually increases rate, such that by 160 hours there's nearly 50% proficiency. And by 200 hours, finally, 100% proficiency.
A graph of the Learning Curve of two different skills.

This is an English phrase that has long bothered me. It makes me wonder if it’s another of those things that so many people got it wrong, that by popular usage, the wrong understanding became the most-accepted way to say it. E.g. “I could care less.”

When someone says that something has “a steep learning curve,” I thing we pretty much unanimously understand that they mean it will be difficult to become proficient. Much effort over many, many hours (or days, or years) to attain expert proficiency.

But look at the graph I’ve provided at the top of this post. It is clear that the green line is the steeper of the two. Yet that imaginary skill was mastered in about half of the time of the other. The red line starts shallower, does become steeper at some point later, but the steepest part of that curve is still not as steep as the green line. Yet this imaginary red skill wasn’t mastered until 200 hours of effort, at the far upper-right corner of the graph. More effort. Took longer. But it’s a shallower learning curve.

What are your thoughts? Why do we say it like this?

By Kelvin D. Olson

Not saying much here. What you really want to see is https://mastodon.hams.social/@kelvin0mql

1 comment

  1. For what it’s worth, I tend to catch myself before uttering the illogical phrase, and instead say “long learning curve” with drawn out emphasis on “long”. Everybody understands what I mean, and I haven’t said anything incorrect.

Comments are closed.